Law360 Canada ( December 20, 2024, 12:38 PM EST) -- Appeal by Appellant from a judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal which set aside in part a decision of the Superior Court of Quebec. The Youth Division of the Court of Québec (Tribunal) issued an order that X be placed in a rehabilitation centre because her security and development were in danger. Following that order, X was placed in various units in rehabilitation centres where she was subject to multiple isolation and restraint measures. X and her parents each brought applications alleging that her rights had been encroached upon. The Tribunal declared that X's rights had been wronged and ordered several corrective measures. Some corrective measures were appealed by the Director of Youth Protection (DYP) before the Superior Court arguing that they went beyond the corrective powers conferred on the Tribunal by s. 91 para. 4 of the Youth Protection Act (YPA) because they did not relate directly to X’s situation. The Superior Court allowed the DYP's appeal in part, concluding that remedial measure had to apply only to the child who had been a victim of the wrong. The orders were varied to relate only to X. The Court of Appeal determined that the initial orders were overbroad, and that the Superior Court had been correct to restrict their application only to X. The appeals were allowed only to the extent of ensuring that the orders were made against the DYP instead of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux A (CISSS A) which had not formally been a party to the proceedings at first instance. The issues before the Court were to determine the scope of the corrective powers that the legislature intended to confer on the Tribunal in s. 91 para. 4 of the YPA and whether it was possible for the Tribunal to make orders against the CISSS A based on its right to be heard or duly called....