Law360 Canada ( August 19, 2021, 5:27 AM EDT) -- Appeal by the Society of United Professionals from the dismissal of its application for judicial review of decisions of the Labour Relations Board. The Society applied to the Board alleging New Horizon violated ss. 17 and 70 of the Labour Relations Act by failing to negotiate in good faith and by interfering with the Society’s representation of employees in the bargaining unit due to New Horizon’s refusal to disclose the Master Services Agreement (MSA), the contract governing New Horizon’s relationship with Ontario Power Generation (OPG). The Society was not a party to the MSA, and there was no reference to it in the collective bargaining agreement between New Horizon and the Society. The Board rejected the allegation that New Horizon interfered with the Society’s representation of its members and concluded that the Society’s application under s. 17 was premature. The Board concluded that the MSA did not fall within the parameters of information that a union could properly seek. The Board subsequently determined New Horizon violated the duty in s. 17 of the Act to bargain in good faith and ordered partial disclosure of the MSA. In a third decision, the Board rejected the Society’s request to order disclosure of one further provision of the MSA. The Divisional Court concluded that the Board’s decisions were consistent with the existing jurisprudence and justifiable on the facts of the case....